Top 10 Stat Leaders

Top performers by position

View All Stats

🏈 Top 4 Quarterbacks

Ranked by composite score: Passing Touchdowns, Completion %, Completions, and Interceptions

Rank Player Team CMP INC PCT% PTD INT RYD RTD
1 Nate Merseberger Mambas 40 16 71.4% 10 6 0 0
2 Danny Upegui M.O.B 21 9 70.0% 9 2 30 1
3 Tommy Satterfield Mambas 21 13 61.8% 2 1 20 0
4 John Conway Mambas 1 0 100.0% 0 0 0 0

⚡ Top 10 Offensive Players

Ranked by composite score: Receiving Touchdowns, Total Yards, Receptions, and Drops

Rank Player Team RYD RTD REC DROPS REC YAP REC TD TOTAL YD
1 Myles Lewis M.O.B 0 0 15 0 105 7 105
2 Baily Ferraro Mambas 0 0 13 1 397 4 397
3 Jerm Jones Mambas 0 0 18 1 230 3 230
4 Cray Bananas 0 0 23 0 215 3 215
5 Stephen Blackstone Bananas 10 0 5 0 114 2 124
6 Dawson Crawley Certified 0 0 3 1 65 2 65
7 Nic P Mambas 0 0 3 0 55 1 55
8 Alex Barbosa M.O.B 0 0 17 2 45 1 45
9 Shaun Lumpkin Bananas 30 0 9 0 90 0 120
10 Chance Armstrong The Ball Club 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

🛡️ Top 10 Defensive Players

Ranked by composite score: Sacks, Defensive Interceptions, Tackles, and Breakups

Rank Player Team SK TOTAL
TK		 BKP DEF INT
1 JT Mambas 17 23 2 1
2 Brendon Olson Mambas 14 21 2 0
3 Taylor Oneil Mambas 7 7 0 0
4 Lyle Lopez The Ball Club 5 5 0 0
5 Jabril Bananas 4 16 0 1
6 Alex Barbosa M.O.B 0 11 1 4
7 Errol M.O.B 3 12 0 0
8 Cray Bananas 1 11 1 2
9 Myles Lewis M.O.B 1 15 0 2
10 Stephen Blackstone Bananas 0 4 2 3

📊 How Top 10 Leaders Are Calculated

🏈 Top 4 Quarterbacks

Quarterbacks are ranked using a composite score that considers multiple factors, not just touchdowns. This rewards both production and efficiency.

Composite Score Formula:

Score = (PTD × 10) + (Passing % × 0.5) + (Completions × 0.1) - (Interceptions × 2)

Where:

  • PTD = Passing touchdowns (weighted most heavily)
  • Passing % = (CMP ÷ (CMP + INC)) × 100
  • Completions = Total passing completions (CMP)
  • Interceptions = QB interceptions thrown (penalty)

Tie-Breaking Order:

  1. Composite score
  2. Passing touchdowns (PTD)
  3. Passing percentage
  4. Total completions

⚡ Top 10 Offensive Players

Offensive players are ranked by a composite score that rewards touchdowns, total yards, receptions, and penalizes drops.

Composite Score Formula:

Score = (REC TD × 10) + (Total Yards × 0.1) + (Receptions × 0.05) - (Drops × 0.5)

Where:

  • REC TD = Receiving touchdowns (weighted most heavily)
  • Total Yards = Rushing yards (RYD) + Receiving yards (REC YD)
  • Receptions = Total receptions (REC)
  • Drops = Dropped passes (penalty)

Tie-Breaking Order:

  1. Composite score
  2. Receiving touchdowns (REC TD)
  3. Total yards (RYD + REC YD)
  4. Receiving yards (REC YD)

🛡️ Top 10 Defensive Players

Defensive players are ranked by a composite score that heavily weights sacks and interceptions, while also considering tackles and breakups.

Composite Score Formula:

Score = (Sacks × 10) + (Defensive INT × 8) + (Tackles × 0.1) + (Breakups × 0.5)

Where:

  • Sacks = Total sacks (SK) - weighted most heavily
  • Defensive INT = Defensive interceptions caught (DEF INT)
  • Tackles = Total tackles (TK)
  • Breakups = Blocked passes (BKP)

Note: TOTAL TK displayed in the table = Tackles (TK) + Sacks (SK). This combines both defensive stats into a single total.

Tie-Breaking Order:

  1. Composite score
  2. Sacks (SK)
  3. Defensive interceptions (DEF INT)
  4. Total tackles (TK)

💡 Why Composite Scoring?

Instead of ranking by a single stat (like "most touchdowns"), composite scoring provides a more balanced evaluation that considers:

  • Efficiency: A QB with fewer TDs but higher completion % can rank higher
  • Volume: Players with more total yards/receptions get credit for production
  • Penalties: Interceptions and drops reduce scores appropriately
  • Multiple Factors: Considers both production and efficiency, not just one stat

Example - QB Ranking:

QB A: 6 PTD, 50% completion, 20 CMP, 2 INT
Score: (6×10) + (50×0.5) + (20×0.1) - (2×2) = 83 points
QB B: 5 PTD, 70% completion, 30 CMP, 1 INT
Score: (5×10) + (70×0.5) + (30×0.1) - (1×2) = 86 points ✅ (Higher rank)

QB B ranks higher despite fewer touchdowns because of better efficiency and more completions.